An incredibly impactful statement from the Coalition for Smart Safety, an entity comprised of national disability rights groups.

It continues to put to bed the anachronistic notion that ‘mental illness’ is the cause of violence. 

Six Important Points in the letter:

A) People with mental health issues are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators of violence

B) Equating violence and mental health stigmatizes individuals which will dissuade them for seeking help

C) Red Flag laws should be based on behavior and not diagnosis

D) Other countries certainly have people with mental health concerns yet you don’t see this kind of violence in those countries

E) Hate and Racism are not mental health disabilities*

F) Communities of color experience an **inordinate amount of gun violence. These disparities lead to increased mental health needs for PTSD, anxiety and depression.

–Glenn–

Thanks to our friends at NYAPRS for sharing this letter below

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate Speaker Nancy Pelosi U.S. House Minority Leader Mitch McConnell U.S. Senate Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy U.S. House

Statement on Gun Violence Prevention Policy and Mental Health Disabilities by the Coalition for Smart Safety

The recent mass shootings in our country have prompted proposed legislative solutions to prevent further mass gun violence. We appreciate and agree that protecting public safety is and should be paramount to such efforts. However, scapegoating people with mental health disabilities as the cause of this country’s gun violence problem misses the real causes of gun violence, and further harms our communities.

Our nation’s elected officials must not suggest that people with mental health disabilities should be the primary target of gun violence prevention efforts. The rhetoric from some that people with mental health disabilities, including those with perceived mental health disabilities, are inherently dangerous, and that targeting them will solve our country’s gun violence problem, is wrong.1

Studies have shown that people with disabilities, including mental health disabilities, are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.2 Mental health disabilities are not accurate predictors of violence-a fact recognized by the American Psychological Association, among others-and should not be treated as such. In fact, there is very little evidence indicating that individuals diagnosed with mental illness are more likely than anyone else to commit gun crimes.3 While individuals with mental health disabilities should receive healthcare and other support services, legislation that targets people with mental health disabilities  will not be effective in reducing gun violence.

Falsely blaming people with mental health disabilities for violence will stigmatize these individuals, violate their right to privacy, and will likely dissuade some people from seeking help at all.

We understand that federal legislation may include incentives for states to enact extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs), which may be issued by courts to temporarily prevent a person in crisis from accessing firearms. Congress must only support those ERPOs that are based on an individual’s conduct, not on whether that person has a mental health disability or mental health diagnosis. Basing a protection order on disability status or diagnosis, and not conduct or behavior, violates a person’s civil rights-and, as stated above, will not lead to real change.

Statements, talking points, and legislation relying on incorrect assumptions linking mental health to gun violence are counterproductive and only serve to further stigmatize people with mental health disabilities and the disability community as a whole. For example, proposals aimed at identifying children and youth with disabilities-some as young as five or six years old-as potential threats to their schools and communities only serve to further isolate and stigmatize students. This is neither helpful nor effective in increasing safety or reducing gun violence and will ultimately harm children and youth with mental health disabilities.

The simple fact is that other countries around the world have just as many people with mental health disabilities, but they do not experience gun violence at the same magnitude as the United States. This problem is only exacerbated by systemic racism and hatred. Our country is faced with a rise in hate crimes targeting marginalized communities and an increase in
racially motivated mass shootings in recent years.

Hate- and racism are not mental health disabilities, nor should they be treated as such. Indeed, communities of color experience the disproportionate impacts of gun violence.

For instance, Black people experience gun violence disproportionately in the U.S., in that they experience 10 times the gun homicides, 18 times the gun assault injuries, and nearly three times the fatal shootings by police of white people.4 These disparities in experienced violence can lead to mental health disabilities, such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Black adults are more likely than white adults to report symptoms of emotional distress-but only one in three who need mental health care actually receive it.5 People in other racial groups experience similar disparities with mental health care,6 and it is tremendously important to consider much-needed mental health supports when thinking about gun violence legislation. Communities of color must be consulted in any sweeping legislation that impacts them, so that Congress can avoid perpetuating the impacts of white supremacy.

It is an act of prejudice to use people with disabilities as scapegoats for the increased incidences of mass shootings and acts of mass violence in this country. Ultimately, this will do nothing to curb the epidemic of gun violence in our nation. We will not accept or support any legislation that sacrifices the civil rights of people with disabilities in exchange for the appearance of action on gun violence. Effective reform can and should be accomplished without compromising the civil rights of people with disabilities. We call upon all of our legislators to condemn dangerous and discriminatory rhetoric and refute any related legislative proposals that will ignore what it will really take to end this country’s gun violence epidemic and put the lives and freedoms of Americans with disabilities at risk. Please contact Cyrus Huncharek Cyrus.Huncharek@ndrn.org), Lewis Bossing (lewisb@bazelon.org) , or Monica Porter (monicap@bazelon.org ) should you have any questions.

Signed in Solidarity,

American Association of People with Disabilities Autism National Committee Autism Society of America Autistic Self Advocacy Network Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Center for Learner Equity Connecticut Legal Rights Project, Inc.

Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities National Association of Rights Protection & Advocacy (NARPA) National Association of School Psychologists National Center for Learning Disabilities National Disability Rights Network (NDRN) New York Association
of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services The Arc of the United States The Coelho Center The Honorable Tony Coelho

CC: Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Senate Judiciary Committee House Education and Labor Committee House Judiciary Committee Senator Blumenthal Senator Cornyn Senator Graham Senator Murphy Senator Sinema Senator Tillis

The Coalition for Smart Safety includes disability rights, civil rights, education, and privacy organizations working together to stop the false association of gun violence with mental health disability.

1 See Coalition for Smart Safety, “Getting the Facts Straight: Facts about Gun Violence and Mental Health Disabilities”, Available Here:

2 See Abrams, Lindsay, The Atlantic, “Study: People with Mental Illness Are Five Times More Likely to Be Murdered,” Available Here:

Linda A. Teplin, et al., Crime Victimization in Adults with Severe Mental Illness, 62 ARCH. GEN. PSYCHIATRY 911, 914 (Aug. 2005) (“Over one quarter of the SMI sample had been victims of a violent crime (attempted or completed) in the past year, 11.8 times higher than the [general population] rates . . . .”); and Heather Stuart, Violence and Mental Illness: An Overview, 2 Journal of World Psychiatry 121, 123 (June 2003) (“It is far more likely that people with a serious mental illness will be the victim of violence,” rather than its perpetrator.).

3 Metzl, Johnathan M., “Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms,” 105(2) Am. J. Pub. Health 240-49 (2015), available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318286.

4 See Everytown for Gun Safety, “Impact of Gun Violence on Black Americans”, Available Here

5. See National Alliance on Mental Illness, “Identity and Cultural Dimensions: Black/African American” Available Here:

6 See National Alliance on Mental Illness, “Identity and Cultural Dimensions,”  Available Here 

Translate »